According to this paper written steve stewart williams,discrimination does not explain less woman in stem,because
"many studies have found evidence of anti-female discrimination in STEM. At the same time, however, many other studies have failed to find such discrimination, or have found discrimination in favour of women"
Ridiculous to frame communist China as particularly oppressive to women! Communism ended thousands of years of state-enforced, society-enforced & family-enforced patriarchy - indeed, greatly increased sexual equality is (theoretically) a pillar of communism, and that pillar contributed in no small way to the popularity of the ideology.
Also weird to frame Puritans as particularly oppressive to women. They were merely continuing existing patriarchal practices extant in contemporary English culture. The big reason that there was particular friction in the Puritan colonies was that the colonial environment inherently gave women more independence & responsibility compared to back home in England. There was pushback from men because women in the early American colonies were in fact a lot closer to equal than they had been back in Europe, due to the "all hands on deck" effect of living in a new & harsh environment.
Women are oppressed in China. They are allowed to work and be educated, traditional gender norms are enforced in rural areas and also in CCP leadership. I think latter, the clear lack of women in CCP centers of power, is what Alice was referring to.
Xi has increasingly been public about his desire for China to return more to traditional gender norms, as he views progressive attitudes about gender and sexuality as corrupting Western influence.
it's absolutely silly to say this. You are completely ignoring historical & global context. Women are far better off in China now than they were 50 years ago, and certainly FAR better off than they were 100 years ago. Women in China now are also far better off in terms of legal rights & social equality than women presently living in the Muslim world, in Africa, or In India (which together make up at least half the global population). That much is inarguable. Moreover, Japan, bastion of democracy, has equally few women in leadership roles, either in politics or in business.
And if we want people to follow our august example of an enlightened equal society, maybe we should try and actually act like one. Maybe we shouldn't elect clowns or mutilate childrens' genitals. While we are engaging in such stupidity and barbarity as a society, we should expect the civilized world to try and do the *opposite* of whatever we're doing in every regard. Xi is saying, "Look, kids - that's what democracy and sexual liberation gets you! A vicious fool for a leader, and suicidal self-neuterers for your youth!" We're not leading by example any longer - now it's more of a "scared straight" situation.
And now a bunch of US states have banned abortion, even of nonviable pregnancies! Sorry, who's oppressing women? Heal thyself.
On STEM exceptionality, can you cover how personality traits does not cover women’s relatively high exist role there? High-male societies workplaces can be simply a matter of personality differences (things vs human) and intelligence variability (high I.Q. male).
It would be much more interesting if you covered how any or all reverse coalitions happens? How cultural changes happen at any society? How or whether it’s related to the elites? Do they have no roles? What allows any changes to happen? Coalitions by itself just explains how people see and incentivize action, not exactly how people has come to see that cultural change. Did people realize it themselves or did others (elites or cultural figures) “plant” them in?
>Gender gaps in US housework
https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-myth-of-the-lazy-father
Even in dual income households where men and women both work full time .married fathers work(paid+unpaid) more hours than married mothers
>In Norway and North America, male-majority workplaces haemorrhage female talent. This fact alone explains STEM’s exceptionally leaky pipeline.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0890207020962326
According to this paper written steve stewart williams,discrimination does not explain less woman in stem,because
"many studies have found evidence of anti-female discrimination in STEM. At the same time, however, many other studies have failed to find such discrimination, or have found discrimination in favour of women"
Ridiculous to frame communist China as particularly oppressive to women! Communism ended thousands of years of state-enforced, society-enforced & family-enforced patriarchy - indeed, greatly increased sexual equality is (theoretically) a pillar of communism, and that pillar contributed in no small way to the popularity of the ideology.
Also weird to frame Puritans as particularly oppressive to women. They were merely continuing existing patriarchal practices extant in contemporary English culture. The big reason that there was particular friction in the Puritan colonies was that the colonial environment inherently gave women more independence & responsibility compared to back home in England. There was pushback from men because women in the early American colonies were in fact a lot closer to equal than they had been back in Europe, due to the "all hands on deck" effect of living in a new & harsh environment.
Women are oppressed in China. They are allowed to work and be educated, traditional gender norms are enforced in rural areas and also in CCP leadership. I think latter, the clear lack of women in CCP centers of power, is what Alice was referring to.
Xi has increasingly been public about his desire for China to return more to traditional gender norms, as he views progressive attitudes about gender and sexuality as corrupting Western influence.
it's absolutely silly to say this. You are completely ignoring historical & global context. Women are far better off in China now than they were 50 years ago, and certainly FAR better off than they were 100 years ago. Women in China now are also far better off in terms of legal rights & social equality than women presently living in the Muslim world, in Africa, or In India (which together make up at least half the global population). That much is inarguable. Moreover, Japan, bastion of democracy, has equally few women in leadership roles, either in politics or in business.
And if we want people to follow our august example of an enlightened equal society, maybe we should try and actually act like one. Maybe we shouldn't elect clowns or mutilate childrens' genitals. While we are engaging in such stupidity and barbarity as a society, we should expect the civilized world to try and do the *opposite* of whatever we're doing in every regard. Xi is saying, "Look, kids - that's what democracy and sexual liberation gets you! A vicious fool for a leader, and suicidal self-neuterers for your youth!" We're not leading by example any longer - now it's more of a "scared straight" situation.
And now a bunch of US states have banned abortion, even of nonviable pregnancies! Sorry, who's oppressing women? Heal thyself.
On STEM exceptionality, can you cover how personality traits does not cover women’s relatively high exist role there? High-male societies workplaces can be simply a matter of personality differences (things vs human) and intelligence variability (high I.Q. male).
It would be much more interesting if you covered how any or all reverse coalitions happens? How cultural changes happen at any society? How or whether it’s related to the elites? Do they have no roles? What allows any changes to happen? Coalitions by itself just explains how people see and incentivize action, not exactly how people has come to see that cultural change. Did people realize it themselves or did others (elites or cultural figures) “plant” them in?