Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Rigsby's avatar

This explains a lot about some Taliban policies that superficially make no sense (like ordering the closure of beauty parlors, which were already women-only spaces and didn't raise any issues of sexual propriety).

The social ideal they're trying to enforce here is that men should have same-gender social networks beyond their extended families, but women should not. It seems as if family members might not be effective as members of a Reverse Dominance Coalition... the power of those relationships is basically "the strength of weak ties".

Expand full comment
E Scott Osborne's avatar

Thank you for this. It is super helpful for women who may seem/act/feel otherwise reasonably independent and yet struggle against male dominance in the private/household sphere. So common! I will use this in workshops and trainings.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts