Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jon Norberg's avatar

I have learned so much from your posts. I love the data-rich analysis. I have a question: isn’t the term ”male honor” very biassed by patriarchal thinking? Isn’t ”male insecurity” a more accurate word? Wouldn’t the use of the term ”male insecurity” instead of ”male honor” possibly have an eroding effect on this way of thinking in highly patriarchical societies?

Expand full comment
Michael Strong's avatar

Excellent work, as always. But given this, "Given weak job-creation and low available earnings, there is little pecuniary incentive for female employment." why not explore the importance of liberalizing the economy to accelerate job creation?

Sadly I'm not surprised that the social media initiative failed. But over time, if there was a rapidly growing economy with associated wage growth and increased female labor force participation, I'd expect gender attitudes to change.

Some time ago I was comparing the claim that education improved conditions for women vs. labor force participation. Egypt stood out as having highly educated women for its stage of development but very low labor force participation. Education of women without labor force participation (and thus financial and social independence for women) is weak sauce.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts